Finance
Payment Protection Insurance: Is It Just A Scam?
Payment protection insurance (PPI) has taken a bashing recently. PPI is a type of insurance designed to protect repayments on financial products if borrowers find that they are in financial difficulty.
PPI has been examined by the Financial Services Authority, criticised by Which? and is now under investigation by the Office of Fair Trading. Most of these organisations are concerned about protecting consumers' rights. They are worried about:
Given these concerns, it's a good time to find out more about whether PPI is really the right choice for borrowers.
Why Have PPI?
It's difficult for borrowers to know how their financial circumstances are going to change. When they are taking out a mortgage, loan, credit card, store card or other financial product, the sales person often offers PPI. The reasons why it might be a good idea are:
All of these circumstances mean that borrowers might not be able to meet the repayments on the mortgage, loan, credit card or store card. This could result in arrears, defaults, County Court Judgements (CCJs) and, depending on the type of loan product, the loss of their home. Payment protection insurance is designed to make sure that repayments are met, avoiding this sticky financial situation.
Inside PPI
PPI is available to most people aged 18 to 65 who are employed for at least 16 hours a week or have been self-employed for a long period. Once borrowers have signed up for the insurance, they have to wait a certain period before making a claim. This is usually 60 to 120 days. Once they do make a claim and have it accepted, their payments can be covered for a period of 12 months or more, depending on the policy.
One key thing that borrowers should be aware of is that the sellers of some financial products add the cost of the PPI policy to the credit being offered. This means that borrowers can end up paying interest on the insurance policy. This is one of the many reasons that PPI selling has been criticised. Borrowers should also look into the cost of the insurance, as this varies widely.
Beyond PPI
Many borrowers do not realise that they do not have to take out PPI at the time of buying a financial product and the people who are selling PPI often do not make this clear. There are some stand alone PPI providers who may provide a better choice. Borrowers who repay loans from earnings should also consider an income protection policy, which will protect most of their income rather than individual financial products.
Joe Kenny writes for CardGuide.co.uk, offering the latest information on credit cards, more ireading on credit card payment protection insurance. |
Joseph Kenny
Tags: credit, cards, card, insurance, payment, protection, ppi, scam, cost, worth, charge, cover, accidentSimilar articles
Nothing Beats Online Bill Paying for Speed, Simplicity and Security
Almost everyone has found themselves face-to-face with this situation: It's 6 p.m. the day before a big bill is due, and you've forgotten to make the payment. Read more →Online Brokerage
The growing online brokerage industry has become the most fashionable way to purchase and sell stocks. This fueled the actions of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to allocate more of its time and resources in scrutinizing the investment products that the online brokerage industry provides. Read more →Payroll Cards Improve Direct Deposit Participation
It has been estimated that 50 percent to 60 percent of employees paid in the United States participate in a direct deposit service offered by their employers for payroll funds. Read more →Payroll Utah, Unique Aspects of Utah Payroll Law and Practice
The Utah State Agency that oversees the collection and reporting of State income taxes deducted from payroll checks is:State Tax Commission Withholding Tax Development 210 North 1950 West Salt Lake City, UT 84134 (801) 297-2200 (800) 662-4335 (in state) http://tax. Read more →Aphorism
Charlie [Munger] and I would be glad to take any money management organization in the world managing more than $US10 billion and we would be willing to bet that their aggregate investment (performance) will be poorer than a no-load, very low cost index fu
Warren Buffett
